An old, cheap, easy-to-acquire (in the right places) AK-47 has a rate of fire of 600 rounds per minute and an effective range of 300 meters. Given that they're in hiding throughout the last book since their main enemy has taken over the government, why don't either of the Muggle-raised main characters (Harry or Hermione) realize just how good an idea getting a lethal weapon that doesn't require pure hatred to use would be? Such as, say, a gun.Muggles and squibs are characterized by the lack of this magic as a result they cannot use magic, dangerous situation or otherwise. Wands by themselves rarely, if ever, perform magic, but rather operate as channels for the natural magic inherent within the wizard or witch that holds it. There doesn't seem to be any reason I can think of to believe it would do anything in that scenario.In a hypothetical scenario where a muggle or squib is aware of magic and are trapped in a dangerous, life-threatening scenario, if there's a wand nearby and they grab it in an attempt to protect themselves or someone they care about, will: 1) nothing happen? 2) the wand release whatever leftover energy is stored up in a disastrous and uncontrolled manner? or 3) the wand make a conscious decision to either improve the situation with the little magic it has or to make the situation worse depending on its feelings with regards to the person holding it? Essentially, how sapient is a wand, and how much control does a wand possess with regards to what it does whilst being weilded by certain people?.Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix.Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban.Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets. Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone.Please add new entries at the bottom.įor a specific book, please go to its specific page: Harry Potter headscratchers relating to wizards and Muggle weaponry.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |